Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mono-Red Aggro | pfeng | 9-1 | 1st in Jaffer's Tarkir: Dragonstorm Mosh Pit @Jaffer's Arena Amphitheatre |
| Mono-Red Aggro | giovanni iannarelli | 10-4 | None |
| Goblins | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 28, 2025 |
| Mono-Red Aggro | alessandro_cecconi | 9-5 | None |
| Mono-Red Aggro | luke doyle | 8-6 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | stefano vinci | 8-6 | None |
| Mono-Red Aggro | thiago rodrigues | 6-2 | None |
| Mono-Red Aggro | berk elçi | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Meta Performance Analysis
Torbran, Thane of Red Fell ranks #3781 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 74%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Red average: 49.2%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Torbran, Thane of Red Fell is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 4.21 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.9%. Torbran, Thane of Red Fell has a win rate of 60.6%, making it 26.6% better than other 4-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soul-Scar Mage | Creature — Human Wizard | 5 | 65.5% | 1 |
| Bomat Courier | Artifact Creature — Construct | 6 | 61.7% | 0 |
| Blood Moon | Enchantment | 6 | 60.2% | 0 |
| Lightning Strike | Instant | 10 | 59.0% | 2 |
| Grim Initiate | Creature — Zombie Warrior | 6 | 57.7% | 2 |
| Chandra, Awakened Inferno | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 6 | 57.1% | 1 |
| Chandra, Torch of Defiance | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 10 | 56.0% | 0 |
| Tibalt, Rakish Instigator | Legendary Planeswalker — Tibalt | 14 | 52.2% | 3 |
| Ragavan, Nimble Pilferer | Legendary Creature — Monkey Pirate | 5 | 51.8% | 0 |
| Fanatical Firebrand | Creature — Goblin Pirate | 5 | 51.8% | 0 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Torbran, Thane of Red Fell than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lightning Strike | Instant | 2 | 5 | 80.6% | 58.8% | +21.9% |
| Grim Initiate | Creature — Zombie Warrior | 1 | 6 | 77.8% | 64.2% | +13.6% |
| Spikefield Hazard | Instant | 1 | 5 | 72.2% | 59.3% | +12.9% |
| Lava Coil | Sorcery | 2 | 8 | 71.9% | 59.1% | +12.8% |
| Shock | Instant | 1 | 17 | 65.1% | 58.3% | +6.8% |
| Tibalt, Rakish Instigator | Legendary Planeswalker — Tibalt | 3 | 11 | 67.4% | 62.0% | +5.5% |
| Chandra, Acolyte of Flame | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 3 | 6 | 63.0% | 58.2% | +4.7% |
| Scorch Spitter | Creature — Elemental Lizard | 1 | 11 | 62.8% | 58.3% | +4.5% |
| Abrade | Instant | 2 | 10 | 62.5% | 58.7% | +3.8% |
| Blood Moon | Enchantment | 3 | 5 | 60.7% | 57.0% | +3.7% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mono-Red Aggro | 48 | 11.1% | 44.1% |
| Izzet Prowess | 4 | 0.4% | 47.6% |
| Goblins | 2 | 4.7% | 78.6% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 1 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.